Nonviolence and the Struggle
for Democracy
in Iraq and at Home
by Ramzi Kysia
Service at UUCSS on June 20, 2004
Bismallah ar-Rahman ar-Rahim
In the name of God, most Merciful, most Compassionate
On the 1-year anniversary of September 11th, PBS is showed a documentary,
“Faith and Doubt at Ground Zero,” that examined how America’s
faith has been challenged by the terrorist attacks on our country a year
ago. It asked, “Where was God on September 11?”
I find myself with questions of my own. I wonder whether we Americans
really believe that we are the only real people on this planet—or
whether we just act that way?
I was in New York City on September 11th. I was in Baghdad during last
year’s war. And everything I saw, and everything I felt, only reaffirmed
my faith. I saw grief everywhere I looked, and I saw courage in the face
of that grief. I saw Americans in New York, and Iraqis in Baghdad, suffering
under their respective tragedies, come together in their respective communities
to try and overcome their terror. I felt a spirit of brotherhood and sisterhood,
from people who I had feared would look at me, as a Muslim in New York
or as an American in Baghdad, as their “enemy.”
The sign at the memorial in New York City’s Union Park after September
11th that stands out in my mind more than any other simply read, “We
don’t want this to happen to anyone else ever again.” But
it does happen, all the time, all over the world.
The sign in Baghdad, before the war, that stands out in my mind simply
read: “Baghdad, where the world comes for peace.” It was meant
as stupid propaganda, I’m sure, to flatter Saddam Hussein, but without
intending it, it stated a simple truth: that we must be present, even
in the midst of violence—especially in the midst of violence—in
order to build peace.
War is catastrophe. It is terrorism on a truly massive scale. It is the
physical, political and spiritual devastation of entire peoples. War is
the imposition of such massive, deadly violence so as to force the political
solutions of one nation upon another. War is the antithesis of democracy
and freedom. War is the most bloody, undemocratic and violently repressive
of all human institutions, and that reality must define our opposition
to war and violence.
The war in Iraq is not just a war in Iraq. It’s a war over what
the structure of our world will be, and it will neither be won nor lost
by either the success or failure of soldiers on bloody battlefields. This
is our war, yours and mine. Its ultimate ends belong to us, and we will
win or lose it.
I don’t know why God allows atrocities to occur, but then I don’t
understand why we commit them in the first place, and I think that should
be where the questioning starts. Our security cannot depend on the insecurity
of everyone else. If there was a purpose to September 11, we won’t
realize it until we start seeing the rest of humanity as we see ourselves,
until we realize, deeply realize, that for as long as any of us in this
world are unsafe—all of us our unsafe.
That challenge is where faith begins, and in its failure is where faith
dies, for the only place we can possibly wage war against inhumanity is
in our own hearts.
In a world increasingly embracing collective insanity, what our governments
do is almost irrelevant. They will do what governments always do—try
to protect their own power to the best of their abilities. It’s
what we the peoples of this world do or don’t do that will decide
the war, and living that question defines our struggle.
In the days after September 11th, George Bush stood in front of the world
and shouted at the world that it was time for everyone to choose sides.
It was perhaps the only thing in his presidency that he’s ever been
right about. It is time to choose sides—it’s long past time.
Our problem is that George Bush and Osama bin Laden are on the same side:
the side that believes in the redemptive power of violence, the side that
believes that you can kill your way to peace.
We’re seeing the destructive futility of that vision playing itself
out in the streets of Iraq and Afghanistan today. Love is the redemptive
force in our lives—violence and killing are simply sins.
Iraq is not a war zone. Iraq is a place of marriage and loves, of children
and artistry, of entrepreneurship and creativity. Iraq is a place of human
devotions to which war has been brought, and as we struggle against this
war, we must all of us journey to Iraq, at the least within our hearts.
Violence can and does solve problems in our world. Violence ended the
rule of the Taliban. Violence rid us of the tyrant Saddam. But these are
only its superficial consequences. Violence’s most fundamental creation
is Diaspora, the destruction of community. Violence in Afghanistan and
Iraq has destabilized vast populations of human beings who were already
living inside of already unacceptable catastrophes. Violence has built
walls between those peoples and ours, enflamed prejudices and injustice,
entrenched persecutions and raw greed, and created fears leading to hatreds
and depression and despair. This is the central truth that lies at the
heart of violence—the brutal severing of human ties and emotions.
Violence disrupts all of our lives:
- economically, through the destruction of workspaces
for employment and opportunity;
- culturally, through the destruction of common spaces
for art or sports or leisure, common spaces for interaction;
- intellectually, through the destruction of space
for education, for debate, for dissent;
- physically, through the physical damage violence
does to our bodies, through the physical destruction of life;
- and emotionally, through the sheer weight of all
of these losses: loss of life, and the loss of the creative space in
which to be human.
This destruction is the essential definition of Diaspora: the destruction
of our human spaces.
Diaspora is not limited to refugee populations fleeing or exiled from
their physical homes. Everywhere we look, our world is on fire: violence
threatens to consume us. To look at our world today is to stare nakedly
at the face of our possible extinction. And we have to say that fear,
anger and depression are honest reactions to this reality—justified
reactions to this reality. But these honest reactions, these different
types of withdrawal, make it that much harder for us to make peace—with
ourselves and with our world. And at their heart, these withdrawals, these
legacies of violence all call to the shared human struggle against Diaspora.
We are all of us in Diaspora, wherever we are, when we are disconnected
from what it means to be human, when we are disconnected from the basic
joy of the human experience.
People sometimes ask about our “failure”—the failure
of the anti-sanctions movement over long years of struggle, the failure
of the anti-war movement over short months of protest. But the question
is itself a lie.
Nonviolence can and does prevent catastrophe. Nonviolence multiplies
opportunities a thousand-fold until seemingly insignificant events converge
to tumble the tyranny of fears that violence plants within our hearts.
Where violence denies freedom, destroys community, feeds Diaspora—we
must be present, cultivating our love, our active love, for our entire
family of humanity.
It can be overwhelming to stare, wide-eyed, into the crushing weight
of a $400 billion a year killing machine, fed by fear-mongering politicians,
headed by a fool, protected by a captive media, only existing to maintain
an entrenched corporate-capitalist system that is eating our world alive.
But if we would wonder at our inability as yet to fully overcome the death
sellers and fear merchants, let us also wonder at how hard they have to
work to keep their system running. Out-spent and out-shouted a million
to one by the killers and their apologists, we persevere.
This isn’t testament to some special talents or conditions unique
to us, it’s testament to the fact that war and killing, despite
being with us from our birth, are not the natural state of humankind.
Peace work isn’t naïve or ineffective, it’s extremely
effective, and it’s informed by the spirit of what it truly means
to be human. Its only problem is that not enough people are doing it.
Peace is not an abstract ideal—it is a living and tangible reality
that takes practice, that must be practiced, to be real.
This is the crux of choosing our sides in this war—understanding
what peace is. Pacifism is a radical challenge to every aspect of worldly
power, and if it isn’t—it isn’t pacifism. Non-violent
action isn’t just protest and persuasion—it’s non-cooperation
and direct intervention as well. As long as pacifism is confused with
acceptance, or even with simple protest, then regardless of how passionate
our rhetoric may be—we’ve failed. And however misguided we
may believe violent action or resistance to be, we have to recognize that
at the least it is action, it is resistance.
We have to ask the question: Why is it so easy for us to be willing to
pick up arms and risk our entire lives, and so difficult for us to put
down those same weapons and still risk our lives—in the cause of
life?
Answering that question is the struggle, and in that struggle, know that
we are not only standing against violence, we are also wiping its effects
away from our own lives—through the struggle we are ending our own
Diasporas.
Because the challenge of pacifism isn’t just in reaction or resistance
toward violence, it lies in continually inculcating, nurturing and recreating
the reality of our world as a beloved community.
Our goals for Iraq: peace, freedom, democracy—our goals are the
same as George Bush’s stated goals. And the problem isn’t
simply that he’s lying—it’s much too easy to say that.
I genuinely believe that George Bush, and the common culture he represents,
does not understand that peace is not simply a goal, but must be the means
toward that goal.
How can peace result from a situation where we are constantly using violence,
overt and implied, in our relationship with Iraqis, and demanding that
Iraqis either quietly submit to that violence or enthusiastically join
us in committing it against any of their countrymen whom we designate
as criminal?
We have to heal this dangerously delusional mindset, before it leads
us further into disaster. This is the logic of Ariel Sharon’s Israel—the
logic that says that even though Israel wants to end the Occupation of
the West Bank, or America the Occupation of Iraq, we cannot do it as long
as anyone resists those occupations, because if we did we would be “rewarding
terror.” What sense is this? Does quitting smoking “reward”
lung cancer? Does putting a roof on your house “reward” the
rain?
No nation, even ours, can justly rule another peoples. Violent action
and violent resistance is the basic logic of Occupation.
If our end goal in Iraq is self-determination, then every decision, every
element of the path toward self-determination must be guided by and decided
by Iraqis. If our end goal is peace, then every action taken toward that
goal must be rooted in peace, must in itself create space for peace rather
than for violence. Peace is not a noun. It’s not a thing you can
take and put up on a shelf somewhere. Peace is action, living actions.
I was in Iraq last year during the war, with Voices in the Wilderness.
We were there to physically stand against the war, and to accompany our
sisters and brothers in Iraq during the war—to share the same risks
that they did, and put our entire lives on the line. That was resistance,
and it needed doing, but it was not the body of work we did. Nor did the
body of our work before the war lay simply in breaking sanctions, in publicly
violating an unjust law. The body of our work was in visiting schools,
and creating pen-pal programs so Iraqi and American students could directly
communicate, in visiting hospitals and doing arts and crafts with the
children there, in visiting families and fostering friendships that could
stand, and have stood, in the wake of violence and killings. In creating
space for peace.
This is often derided as “weak,” or “fuzzy.”
But nothing could be further from the truth. Fostering community is a
direct and effective challenge to the destruction that violence brings.
Violence is the refuge of the incompetent, and the only weakness in meeting
it is in failing to resist it. To those who accuse me of weakness for
refusing to take arms, I quote my favorite poet, Emily Dickinson, when
she wrote:
Perhaps you think me stooping
I'm not ashamed of that
Christ—stooped until He touched the Grave
Do those at Sacrament
Commemorate Dishonor…?
There is hope in Iraq. There is nonviolent resistance happening on a
daily basis: marches and protests against the violence of both Saddam
and the Occupation, in support and remembrance of those disappeared by
both Saddam and America, marches and protests against unemployment and
against lootings and rapes, against car bombings and against shootings.
There are unions that have been formed all across the country, and elections
for union leaders. There have been local elections held, mostly spontaneously,
all across Iraq for neighborhood and city councils. Communities have banded
together to try to provide food and electricity and security for themselves
and their neighbors. And when assassinations have occurred over the last
year, religious and community leaders have come together, across sects
and ethnic divisions, to promote peace and prevent violent escalation.
And each of these actions are not only nonviolent, but fundamentally democratic.
This isn’t to underestimate the challenges Iraqis face. Hundreds
of thousands of Iraqis were killed by Saddam, hundreds of thousands were
killed in the war with Iran, tens-of-thousands in the 1991 war with America,
hundreds of thousands died as a result of the sanctions, and tens of thousands
have died as a direct or indirect result of last year’s war. Indeed,
it would be hard for me to overstate or exaggerate the devastation caused
by 30 years of brutal dictatorship, 3 catastrophic wars, and 13 years
of punishing sanctions. But there is hope.
Iraq is unsafe—for 25 million human beings who cannot leave, but
I have never known a people as resourceful, nor as consistently kind,
in the face of such extreme violence, as Iraqis. They are my hope.
Democracy is not simply about elections, it is perhaps not even primarily
about elections. Democracy is about the right for all people to individually
and collectively create their own destiny—the right of each of us
to write our own histories. And nonviolent resistance, even if not articulated
that way, is the primary means by which Iraqis—as all peoples—are
organizing to meet their nation’s challenges. Nonviolence, democracy,
civilization—these are all words that describe different aspects
of the same essential thing—the work of building community.
Iraq is a civilized country. Iraq is the Cradle of Civilization. The
word “urban,” comes from the name of the Iraqi city of Ur,
the birthplace of Abraham—the father of 3 of this world’s
major religions. In Iraq humankind discovered written language, mathematics,
the first written code of law. The image many Americans have of Iraqis—as
either being terrorists or victims—is much too simple.
Governments will do what they always do—try to protect their power
to the best of their ability. That almost doesn’t matter. It’s
what we, the common peoples of our world, do—and why we do it—that
will matter.
It may seem strange for me, a Muslim, to close by quoting a Christian,
or as a pacifist to cite the man who tried to justify war, but St. Augustine
once wrote something that I like very much. He said that Hope has two,
beautiful daughters: Anger and Courage. He said that Hope was the greatest
of all virtues, even greater than love. Because Love only tells us what
God’s Will is, while Hope tells us that God will work God’s
will.
Our world is in trouble, and we have every right to be angry about it.
There is much to be angry about. But let it be a hopeful anger, an anger
born from the knowledge that Love’s Will will be done. Let it be
a courageous anger, that gives us the strength to take risks—the
physical risks of standing against violence, the emotional risks of loving
those who think they are our enemies.
Connection is the opposite of, and the antidote for, Diaspora. We are
all of us connected, and recognizing that reality is the joy of the human
experience.
Peace and freedom—true freedom—are concrete and tangible
things that we can only build if we decide to stand up and be present.
They take struggle. They take risks. In a larger sense—they are
the struggle. It begins with the connections we make here with one another,
the connections we make with our sisters and brothers outside this room,
throughout our nation, throughout all nations.
And it never ends.
|